This questions has been raised and will be addressed in the following “Elevator Speech”
“Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth are not compatible with the goals & objectives of the Providence sessions? … I don’t understand … please explain …”
The Elevator Speech
Simply, the story of 9/11 has an enormous power over the political dialogue today. Ask anybody.
- When you talk about civil liberties, you get 9/11 as the answer why we can’t have those.
- When you ask why there is so much “Islamophobia” today, you get 9/11 as the reason “we need to watch them.”
- When you talk about the priority of educating our children, you get 9/11 as the answer why we have no money left for them.
- When you want to talk about the need for science education in our schools, why bother when we are told not to apply basic science when looking at the destruction of the three skyscrapers on 9/11.
The official story of impact-induced structural trauma, followed by fire, followed an hour later by the instantaneous commencement of a catastrophic “gravitational” collapse is wrong. Actually, it is impossible. Gravitational forces alone would be insufficient to destroy those buildings. Lots of extra “inside the structure” energy would be needed. The remnants of un-ignited incendiaries in the dust points to one source of that extra energy.
If this irrefutable evidence of 9/11 can be distorted and hidden in plain sight, what chance will your economic and social stories face in a media that is not concerned with facts?
How Many Architects and Engineers?
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is a professional organization who has welcomed over 1700 verified and vetted degreed architects and engineers to sign a petition calling for a new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11. That is a lot of architects and engineers raising “red-flags” about fraudulent reports. And these reports are about World Trade Center on 9/11 … which makes them important.
Why Don’t You Know This?
If one engineer publicly said that a report regarding the safety of a bridge was fraudulent, it would be front page news. Over 1700 architects and engineers saying the reports about the destruction of the World Trade Center are fraudulent should be widely known and corrections demanded. But these concerns are not anywhere in the media, including on DailyKos. For example, the DailyKos precedent of banishing people from talking about 9/11 was established in 2005 before any “official” reports were published. Its policy has not been reversed even though the technical community has given its thumbs-down to these fraudulent reports.
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth compiled evidence will lead you to ask really hard questions that start with wondering what is wrong with the mainstream and approved “alternative” media.
Netroots attendees should know that there is a key piece of information missing, which if known, would help understand why there is so much disharmony in our world. Misinformation and disinformation. Science and physics should be called on to help address the misinformation.
Many know something is wrong, but are silent
Furthermore, it is our expectation based on anecdotal evidence and most recently by a survey, that about 50 percent of the Netroots attendance would be familiar with the AE911Truth evidence. About 40 percent would be unaware of key facts. This large segment would learn a lot with just a little fact based information about what happened at the World Trade Center.
Here is a link to the survey that was mentioned (DRAFT). It was taken in March at the United National Anti-War Conference.
As Dr. Martin Luther King said, “There comes a time when silence is betrayal”