Let the Architects In

Architects have been denied space at the Netroots Nation Exhibit Hall to discuss science and physics.  Our request for reconsideration has not been answered.  Consequently, we are launching a “Let the Architects In” campaign and we call upon Netroots Nation supporters to help us correct this information void at Netroots Nation.

President Barack Obama’s inaugural promise to, “restore science to it rightful place…” sounded like good news.  This statement was needed because scientific integrity had been placed well behind politics in analysis, not only in areas such as climate change and public health issues, but also particularly in analysis of the attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001.

View our June 6th Press Release.

Comments on “Let The Architects In”

As of Tuesday evening, there are 51 comments in favor of letting the architect exhibit in the Netroots Nation  exhibition hall and zero against.  The credentials of these commenters include the Past President of the Fulbright Association of the United States, nationally recognized journalists, documentary producers, science teachers, professional engineers, presidents of union locals, firefighters and many others.  You can view them at the bottom of this page (or this link).

If you would like to leave a comment, you may do so by clicking here.  Please stick to one of the following  topics:

  1. Now that the facts behind the controlled demolition hypothesis are firmly established, should they be acknowledged?
  2. Should architects and engineers be barred from talking about science, especially physics?
  3. Are the facts behind 9/11, focused on what destroyed the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, irrelevant today?

Comments will be moderated.  You can see them on this comment page.

Daily Kos / Netroots Nation

Founder of the DailyKos, Markos Moulitsas Zúniga, specifically excludes discussion of the attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001.  He defends his blog policy on DailyKos in Controversial Diary Topics by declaring, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” Netroots Nation, having the same world view as its founder, has undoubtedly also adopted this unconscionable policy.

However, as noted on the Extraordinary Evidence pages

“Repeat offenders can and will be banned. Yes, this does include ‘controlled demolition’ of WTC 7.”


Controversial 9/11 Diaries

DailyKos accepts that the 9/11 attacks were perpetrated by agents of Al-Qaeda. It is forbidden to write diaries that:

  1. refer [...]
  2. refer to claims that the airplanes that crashed into the WTC and Pentagon were not the cause of the damage to those buildings or their subsequent collapse.

Authoring or recommending these diaries may result in banning from Daily Kos.

The Extraordinary Evidence is now here!

But now …  it is time for the extraordinary evidence to be acknowledged, talked about and acted upon.

In fact, the organization, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth agrees with Markos that ”Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”  In fact AE911Truth has over 1,700 architect and engineer petition signers, verified and vetted professionals (real professionals, see their names … view their professional statements … read them all), who believe that engineering reports must not contain incomplete and unsupportable analysis.  This is because fraudulent engineering reports are an affront to the building design and engineering professions.

Architects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7

AE911Truth’s documentary, Solving the Mystery, the Destruction of World Trade Center Building #7, is designed for newcomers to this issue.   Join actor Ed Asner and Architect Richard Gage, AIA and founder of Architects and Engineers as they narrate an unfolding story that decimates the official account (“collapse due to normal office fires”) of this 47 story high-rise which was destroyed on the afternoon of 9/11 in record time: top to bottom in under 7 seconds – and at free-fall acceleration for a third of its fall.

Solving the Mystery includes several of the dozens of technical and building experts that were interviewed and that appear in our just released full length documentary – 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out. Altogether there are more than 1,700 Architects & Engineers that have signed the AE911Truth petition calling for a new investigation of the destruction of all 3 skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11.

Watch “Solving the Mystery of WTC 7″

9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (Final Edition) Providence Screening June 10, 2012

AE911Truth is part way through a World Premiere Tour of its new documentary 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (Final Edition) from the West Coast to the East Coast and is traveling to over 30 cities across the country in six weeks. The tour will come to New England on June 10th and we will be stopping in Providence at the end of the Netroots Nation convention.   The documentary features cutting-edge 9/11 evidence presented by over 40 experts in their fields, such as high-rise architects, structural engineers, physicists, chemical engineers, firefighters, metallurgists, explosives experts, controlled demolition technicians, and concludes with psychologists and therapists discussing why this is such a hard message for Americans to hear. Now that it is completed, it will be submitted to film festivals around the world.

Sunday, June 10, 2012 at 2:00 PM
ROOTS (the PICA / Roots Café)
276 Westminster Street, Providence RI
Two blocks south of the Westin / Biltmore Hotels

Netroots Nation refuses to “Let the Architects In”

We have had communications with the organizers of Netroots Nation.  This was followed-up with their Board of Directors about their denying our participation in the Exhibit Hall.

After the initial notification, the communication was more one-sided that we would have liked, as there were no responses.  You can see our request for reconsideration letter here.

Chronology Leading to Irrefutable “Extraordinary Evidence”

On July 08, 2005, when Markos wrote this policy for the Daily Kos, the state of understanding about the destruction of the three World Center Skyscrapers was quite different than it is today. Here is a chronological overview (more detailed chronology is here) of what happened to establish “exceptional evidence:”

July 2005 Markos establishes Daily Kos Policy (Note the official reports are not out yet)
2005 NIST Publishes the NCSTAR reports on the twin towers
2006 Richard Gage, a practicing architect who designs steel-framed structures first hears about the collapse of WTC Building 7 and founds Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth to demand a real investigation
2008 NIST releases the NCSAR draft reports on destruction of the World Trade Center Building 7. A question by a high school physics teachers requires NIST to admit free-fall acceleration for eight stories.  This admission of free-fall is significant because fires could not cause this.  Simultaneous, coordinated removal of all structural elements would have been needed.
2008 NIST releases the NCSAR draft reports on destruction of the World Trade Center Building 7 which describes the free-fall, but does not explain how it could happen.
2009 Peer reviewed analysis of red-gray chips in the WTC dust provides evidence (which remains unchallenged today) of active thermitic material (a highly-engineered incendiary).
2012 With many intervening documents, AE911Truth releases the final edition of the documentary 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out in which 40 highly-credentialed experts describe how the NIST explanation of the twin Towers and Building 7 cannot be correct.
June 2012
(We are hopeful)
Daily Kos rescinds is rule prohibiting the discussion of controlled demolition at the World Trade Center.  Discussion of the AE911Truth evidence is encouraged.


Help us get into the Exhibit Hall

Help us by tweeting a message to @Netroots_Nation

Use something like the following  (PLEASE! do not depart from physical evidence!):

“Architects should be allowed to exhibit.  I agree with ‘Let The Architects In’”
“Science is important. I agree with ‘Let The Architects In’”
“Why teach Science if it is to be ignored. I agree with ‘Let The Architects In’”

Send the message by Facebook at Netroots Nation  (PLEASE! do not depart from physical evidence!)

Also,  in your communications please consider asking the Netroots Nation organizers to provide Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth with a “courtesy (or reduced cost)” exhibit space in recognition of their oversight.  It is long overdue to Let the Architects in!

Contact us via twitter at: @LetArchitectsIn
“Let the Architects In” is an activity of a local AE911Truth Action Group

Posted in Uncategorized | 63 Comments